Re: WDSCi versus Eclipse + MyEclipse

[NGay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Paul,

As someone else already replied, I think WDSC (particularly the test
environment) is very memory hungry.  I can really notice the difference
between trying to run it on my machine with 1 GB RAM, where the WTE starts
in 30 seconds (at most) and or on my other machine with 512K RAM, where the
WTE takes of the region of 90 seconds to start up.  If you get down to 256K
RAM it must be totally unusable.

So I don't find the WTE too bad.  Because it starts in 30 seconds I don't
miss the lack of hot code replace either, and I can only recall one
situation where I've managed to crash it (inserting certain tags in the JSP
editor without adding in the closing tags at the same time).  The only
thing which does really bug me is the performance of the editor itself,
e.g. it takes 10-15 seconds to switch between views/perspectives, or when
you double click to open up a JSP sometimes that can take 10-15 seconds to
open up.

I've never used the MyEclipse plugin so don't have much to go by in terms
of a comparison.

Regards,

Nigel Gay,
Computer Patent Annuities.



|---------+------------------------------>
|         |           "Paul Holm"        |
|         |           <pholm@planetjavain|
|         |           c.com>             |
|         |           Sent by:           |
|         |           java400-l-bounces@m|
|         |           idrange.com        |
|         |                              |
|         |                              |
|         |           31/05/2005 01:54 PM|
|         |           Please respond to  |
|         |           Java Programming on|
|         |           and around the     |
|         |           iSeries / AS400    |
|         |                              |
|---------+------------------------------>
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                 |
  |       To:       "Java 400 List" <java400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>                    
                                 |
  |       cc:                                                                   
                                 |
  |       Subject:  WDSCi   versus  Eclipse + MyEclipse                         
                                 |
  
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Internally, our team has been using WDSCi 5.1.2.    We have had several
issues with the IDE including:

a)       Performance
b)       WebSphere Test Environment (WTE) performance taking up to 10
minutes to start the server
c)       Hot code replace with WTE
d)       Crashes
e)       JDK currency

We have not been able to remedy the situation.  A colleague recommend
trying
Eclipse with the MYECLIPSE plug in.  We have done some initial
Testing and have been pleased and impressed with just base Eclipse 3.0.
Before we switch over in mass, I would like to get others experience in
this
area.

1.           Has anyone done any comparisons between WDSC  (WebSphere
Studio) versus
Eclipse 3.0 with the MYECLIPSE plugin?
2.           Have others "struggled" with WDSCi 5.1 and 5.1.2?




Thanks,  Paul

Business: 760-432-0600   Cell:  760-415-8830
PlanetJ - Makers of WOW  (AKA... WebSphere on Steroids)
You Need Web?  You Need WOW!  www.planetjavainc.com
WOW!!!! <http://www.planetjavainc.com/wow.html>


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 5/30/2005
--
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.








********************************************************************************
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee; access to this
email by anyone else is unauthorised.

If you are not the intended recipient: (1) you are kindly requested
to return a copy of this message to the sender indicating that you
have received it in error, and to destroy the received copy; and (2)
any disclosure or distribution of this message, as well as any action
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on its content, is prohibited
and may be unlawful.
********************************************************************************