|
Joe, > > I would never use EJBs, except for... well for anything, really. There > isn't a single iSeries industry expert that I know of who still promotes > EJB. Joe, do you remember me?, so I'm no iSeries industrial expert in your opinion??? Do you really think you are the one and only expert??? > Java purists do, of course, because it's "platform independent", > as does IBM, because it requires LOTS of horsepower. The main things are scalability and better separation of business layer and controller; not platform indipendence! I've made some reviews of projects in the last three years and the projects not using ejbs had more problems with business code in the controller (especially using STRUTS, thats one of the weak points). > > Start with this: in order to use EJB you must journal all your files. Joe, more then 10 years ago we journaled all files in an environment without any java programms, totally rpg without commit, we've journaled all files, for recovery after program faults and for problem detection, whats wrong with journaling??? Dieter Bender
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.