RE: framework question

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> But, I don't think you can draw the line saying procedural for
business
> logic and OO for presentation (or whatever) so firmly.

Actually, Charles, yes I can.  I am in fact doing just that: I am
stating, for the umpteenth time, that procedural code is better for
business logic than OO.  Just like I can say that native I/O is better
than SQL for transaction processing, and just like I can say that EJB is
useless for just about anything.

I can say these things:

A) Because they're my opinion.

B) I've got enough experience in the field writing every kind of
computer program in every kind of computer language that my opinion
bears at least a little weight.


> Which is fine, we can agree to disagree Joe.  I keep an open mind
about
> it. Maybe you'll convince me.

Actually, I don't really want to convince you.  I'll present my
viewpoint and, if you rebut, I will point to what I consider the error
of your ways.  If you don't think my opinions hold water, then by all
means do your own thing.  But if you post publicly that OO is a good
idiom for business rules, I will respond.

Joe