RE: Performance and Dev Cost--J2EE Vs .NET -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

ASNA are adding .NET support to their VRPG product. OK it's not true RPG
support, but.......

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com]
Sent: 30 October 2001 11:10
To: java400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Performance and Dev Cost--J2EE Vs .NET

Folks, I'm as interested as the next person in whatever Microsoft is doing
to destroy Java this week, but let's not turn this into a .NET vs. Java
religious discussion (or anything else vs. Java, for that matter).

Until .NET supports RPG, it's not really a relevant issue here.

Joe Pluta
Moderator, of sorts

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rizwan Ahmed
>
> Ye thats right that J2EE Petstore was not developed while keeping
> performance Issues in mind.

_______________________________________________
This is the Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 (JAVA400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: JAVA400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l
or email: JAVA400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.