RE: Performance and Dev Cost--J2EE Vs .NET -- JAVA400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Performance and Dev Cost--J2EE Vs .NET
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 05:09:31 -0600
Importance: Normal
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/java400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Java Programming on and around the iSeries / AS400 <java400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:java400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/java400-l>,<mailto:java400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Folks, I'm as interested as the next person in whatever Microsoft is doing
to destroy Java this week, but let's not turn this into a .NET vs. Java
religious discussion (or anything else vs. Java, for that matter).

Until .NET supports RPG, it's not really a relevant issue here.

Joe Pluta
Moderator, of sorts


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rizwan Ahmed
>
> Ye thats right that J2EE Petstore was not developed while keeping
> performance Issues in mind.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.