RE: Can't keep QEJBADMIN running

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frances, I'm really not trying to disparage IBM or the WebSphere team.
Let's end this (online) thread with the agreement that you deliver a LOT of
functionality in a SHORT time, and group PTFs are the only way to do that.
My complaint is about the delivery of group PTFs, and I'll take that up with
you offline.

Joe


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-java400-l@midrange.com
> [mailto:owner-java400-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Frances Stewart
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:47 PM
> To: JAVA400-L@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: Can't keep QEJBADMIN running
>
>
>
> Well it would have been moot...
> I was hoping not to post again, and I probably should not now, but...
>
> You say
>        'Unlike most IBM products WebSphere requires Group PTFs'.
>
> I think it would be better to say
>        'Unlike most IBM products WebSphere, DB2/400, Java/400, IBM HTTP
> Server, WebSphere Commerce Suite, Net.Commerce, Network
>         Station, Backup Recovery Solutions, iSeries Connect, and
> Performance Tools for AS/400 require Group PTFs'
>
> I realize that is just a small number of products compared to the many
> excellent products available for the AS/400; however, the Group
> PTF concept
> was around before WebSphere Application Server for iSeries got into the
> game. We make use of it because it truly is the best way we have to ensure
> that our users get the correct level of PTFs for our product.
>
> Frances Stewart
> WebSphere Application Server for iSeries 400
> IBM Rochester

+---
| This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: joe@zappie.net
+---