|
I am just in the beginning stages and finding out what Java can do for us. But I am leaning toward a fat client using the Client/Server model. Like Joe mentioned, it seems to be a nice middle ground, and it will allow us to better leverage the existing legacy system and employee's skills. -----Original Message----- From: owner-java400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-java400-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of pluta@nexgensoftware.com Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 2:15 PM To: JAVA400-L@midrange.com Subject: Topic number ONE Alright, folks, I'm back and finally caught up from my week in Israel. While I was preparing, I noticed a little lag in discussion here, so I thought it was time to spice things up a little bit. In keeping with my philosophy that this is more than just a "fix list", I'm going to throw out a topic or three for discussion. Then we'll back it up with some actual real-life work. Okay, topic one: Who is planning on using which connectivity technology, and for what? ========= Big question, I know. But let's break it down real quick. The two PRIMARY technologies are ultra-thin client (or anorexic client, as Don Denoncourt calls it, or browser) and "fat" client. There are no other viable options. NONE. (This should spike a bit of controversy <wicked grin>). ---------------- Within browser technology are the following: 1. HTML 2. JavaScript 3. CGI 4. Servlets 5. Active Server Pages 6. Java Server Pages HTML is a completely static page. JavaScript allows some dynamism based on the user's input, but basically affords no connection to any host data. SO for all intents and purposes, both are static. CGI and servlets are pretty much two sides of the same coin: web requests are passed to a program on the host, which in turn generates HTML dynamically for the browser to display. CGI usually calls an HLL program, such as RPG, while servlets are specifically Java programs. Finally, ASP and JSP are the Microsoft and Sun versions of extended scripting languages. Microsoft has basically included Visual Basic programming in its ASP scripting language, along with support for various host functions, such as session information and SQL access. Sun, on the other hand, simply decided to incorporate direct calls to JavaBeans. Both solutions have control features like IF and SELECT and allow creation of program-like constructs within the HTML page. The choice there is primarily one of which technology you want to go with: Microsoft or Java. Oh yeah, I left one off: JWalk and it's equivalents, which are basically 5250 screen-scrapers. Those or even 5250-emulation-in-a-browser are certainly options for those who are looking merely to facelift part or all of their existing legacy systems and/or deploy them on the net. ---------------- Okay, on to fat clients. Fat clients are applications written on a workstation that is typically connected to the local LAN (although you can be connected to the LAN via dial-up, so geographical proximity is not an issue, except as it pertains to moving large amounts of data over the wire). These are not applications run over the internet, although they can be provided your firewall will support them. However, for security reasons they are usually run only locally. They are usually executive information systems, simulations or modeling programs, although they can also be desktop integration programs (for example, you may be able to drag a customer order onto your Email icon in order to send mail to a customer - or maybe to the salesman responsible for that customer!). There are several flavors of these as well: 1. Direct data access (via SQL or native I/O) 2. Client/server access 3. Remote method access 4. Detached processing Direct data access should be reserved for inquiry applications, since you have much weaker control over your database access. If workstations can directly update databases, you can have some serious integrity issues. Client/server and RMI are provide indirect access to data, either through servers or through objects. If you believe that the eventual "universal connectivity language" is going to be Java, RMI is your end goal. Client/server access is the "middle" ground between legacy applications and RMI. You can break your existing code apart into user interface (clients) and business logic (servers) and attach them using some sort of queueing mechanism. Then, you can rewrite the various pieces as time permits, focusing first on your user interface in order to give your end users a graphical interface without having to completely rewrite your entire system. Once both clients and servers are completely rewritten in Java, you can then replace messaging with RMI. Detached processing has to do with downloading a bunch of data to your PC and going off and doing remote things with it. As connectivity increases, this becomes less of an issue, but your field sales and support personnel won't always have constant access to a dial-up at a client site, in which case it would be nice for them to be able to download information (such as customer information for sales or maintenance information and diagrams for support) the night before. -------------- There are probably other paradigms, but these are the most important ones. If you have others, please share. ======== Okay, this being the case, what are you all doing? My current direction is supporting fat clients, because everybody and their brother are supporting browsers. Me and MY brother believe in the little guy <grin>. Anyway, hope this will stir up a little discussion. See yas! +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the JAVA/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to JAVA400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to JAVA400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to JAVA400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.