RE: *** ADMIN question of clarification

["Damon, Mitch" <MDamon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with the requirement that vendors must ID themselves.

Mitch Damon, CPIM
Planning Systems Manager
Birds Eye Foods, Rochester NY
(585) 383-1070 Ext. 250

-----Original Message-----
From:   Bill [SMTP:billzbubb@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Friday, June 06, 2003 12:22 PM
To:     BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: *** ADMIN question of clarification

> Seems to me the changes you have instituted were/are not necessary.  As a
> frequent visitor to this board, it was good to have the "occasional"
input from a
> vendor related to BPCS.  I see no reason to take it away.  Does that mean
> that you also prohibit the posting by anyone from SSAGT?  Seems a bit
extreme to
> me.  What do others think?

Where is everyone getting the impression that SSAGT can no longer reply?
Please quote the equivalent section.

One overdue change was the requirement of a vendor to identify themselves
as such whenever they reply.  We've had numerous instances where vendors
have recommended their products yet not identified themselves.

Bill


_______________________________________________
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.