|
> Seems to me the changes you have instituted were/are not necessary. As a > frequent visitor to this board, it was good to have the "occasional" input from a > vendor related to BPCS. I see no reason to take it away. Does that mean > that you also prohibit the posting by anyone from SSAGT? Seems a bit extreme to > me. What do others think? Where is everyone getting the impression that SSAGT can no longer reply? Please quote the equivalent section. One overdue change was the requirement of a vendor to identify themselves as such whenever they reply. We've had numerous instances where vendors have recommended their products yet not identified themselves. Bill
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.