|
Eric: I did not mean to start a thread on the benefits of long term planning in the world of IT and ERP. Of course it would be beneficial for companies to do this. We assist many of them in this regard. I was just trying to make a simple point. Many companies moved to 4.05CD because of Y2K considerations. This was a way for them to more cost effectively survive through the turn of the century without having to make upgrades to their infrastructure or try to retrofit their modifications into AS/SET. Having just made a significant expenditure within the last few years, many are not yet ready to upgrade their ERP package and wish to spend their time and money elsewhere. That is not to say that they do not have a longer range plan in place. A company need not continually upgrade on the same package as new versions are available. A cost/benefit analysis would identify for them whether this would make sense or not. At some point it is not out of the question to 'freeze' your system and use it until which time that you are ready to bring in new technology, software, infrastructure, etc. My only point is that many companies fall into this situation and that those that do would have no reason to upgrade except for support. I would not have made that statement for those customers that have already made the investment to go to 6.X. They are in a different situation entirely than 4.05CD companies. Sorry if I did not make myself clear before. Mike Bloom Manager, Help Desk Services Nexgen Software Technologies, Inc. (630) 300-6082 Elsberry@aol.co m To: <BPCS-L@midrange.com> Sent by: cc: owner-bpcs-l@mi Subject: RE: BPCS Version 4.05 CD drange.com 02/13/01 11:29 AM Please respond to BPCS-L If you view support as the primary reason to upgrade, you are missing the whole point of moving to the new technologies. There will eventually come a point where there is no choice. Old systems, software and hardware, become more and more expensive to maintain the older they become. It is better to keep a clear strategic view of ERP needs that look out 5 - 10 years into the future. No matter how much your clients like 4.05CD, it is not a strategically viable systems in the long term, and therefore, you are not going your clients any favors by not suggesting that they move to new hardware and software platforms. Eric Elsberry +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.