|
this is too good of a question to ignore! i am also having issues with the cst600/cst500 process. specifically we are having occurrences where the sum of the this level costs is not equal to the bucket 0 this level cost. you mention seven cost buckets. we also have seven cost buckets which are: material material burden outside processing setup labor setup burden run labor run burden you don't mention which cost your bucket 7 is. here is the situation that we have experienced. suppose you have a purchased part and you put in a material cost and possibly a material burden cost. they go into the this level buckets. then suppose you change the part to a mfg part, and add a bill and routing to it. now when you run cst600, the program will calculate all of the setup cost, run costs, and op costs from the routing and place then into the this level costs. when it does this it will also calculate the bucket 0 this level cost, based upon the costs that it just calculated form the routing. but if you have a this level material or material burden cost still sitting in the this level fields, cst600 does not include these costs when it calculates the total this level cost for bucket zero. i have given ssa substantial documentation about this and they claim that this is not a program problem. their explanation is that you should not have this level material costs when you have a routing for a part. in general this should be the case, but i have argued, apparently with no results, that it is more important that they keep the integrity of the cost records. if the bucket 0 total cost for a part is not the sum of the individual cost buckets, you will get inconsistent results when you try to value inventory. we have written several reports where we value inventory using the individual cost bucket (summarized to labor, material, and burden) and these reports show different values than if you use the bucket 0 costs for a part. hopefully this will help. if you are experiencing the same problem please contact ssa and ask them to fix the problem. i believe that the bmr number that i tried to get them to fix this on is bmr 54681. chick doe barton instrument systems >>> JMartin@iwgid.com 04/17/00 11:46AM >>> I am interested in knowing what controls the rollup of the cost buckets. We have 7 cost buckets but when we run CST600, bucket 7 this level isn't included in bucket 0 this level. However, previous level bucket 7 is included in bucket 0 previous level. Thanks, Jerri Martin +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.