RE: performance

["PBS Velka Bites, a.s. - AIS" <hason@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I'm not familiar with v 6.1, we have 6.0.04 apr cum on AS400.
But, that advice below could cause some problems. 
These records in ILI (lopb+lrct......) are set to LID ='LZ'  when you run 
INV903 / month-end close.
So, in my opinion, is better first to run INV900 and then delete non active 
records.
There could be also information in WCUSA (allocated to customer orders) even if 
wopb+wrct+wadj-wiss = 0.
When you are using MRP and CST900 - close shop orders with recalculating costs,
all items from your FSO file should have an apropriate record in IWI.

So, be very carefull.

Regards
                Otto

-----Původní zpráva-----
Od:     Lacelle, Marc [SMTP:LACELLE@rcmint.ca]
Odesláno:       21. června 1999 14:51
Komu:   'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
Předmět:        RE: performance

Hi Ho.

        This one can be tried by anyone who finds that their response times
are slow. This will also improve your reporting times (INV230,INV260 .....)

1.      No users can be on when running these statements (very important)
2.      Do this right after month end
2.      Backup the following files (ILI, IWI)
3.      RUN THESE SQL STATEMENTS
4.      delete from ???/ili where (lopb + lrct + ladju - lissu) = 0
5.      The ??? is the name of your data library
6.      delete from ???/iwi where (wopb + wrct + wadj - wiss) = 0
7.      The ??? is the name of your data library

        These statements can actually take a few minutes. It all depends on
the number of records you have in these data files.

        When I first wrote and tested these statements I was quite surprised
to find that our ILI file went from 365,000 to 100,000 records (this took
about 10 minutes to execute).

        Enjoy

        Marc Lacelle
        Programmer Analyst
        Royal Canadian Mint



> ----------
> From:         jos.kramer@kaochemicals.de[SMTP:jos.kramer@kaochemicals.de]
> Reply To:     BPCS-L@midrange.com
> Sent:         Monday, June 21, 1999 5:16 AM
> To:   BPCS-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      performance
> 
> Dear Members,
> 
> I would like to know if someone has tips on how to improve performance on
> the
> following programms in BPCS 6.1:
> 
> INV300, ORD550 (Action 12 allocations), ORD720 (order allocations).
> Generally all the programm that use allocations are extremely slow.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> jos.kramer@kaochemicals.de
> 
> +---
> | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

application/ms-tnef