On 3/5/14 10:36 AM, CRPence wrote:

The order of the records, collated by the names of the files listed,
is not necessarily a chronological ordering.

Actually, *IF* (as you say) the records are guaranteed to be collated by name, I found something straight from the relevant equine masticatory orifice:

> When a log-version is full, a new version of the log is automatically > created. Each version is a physical file that is named in the
> following way:
> Qxxxyydddn
> where the following is true:
> xxx Is a 3-character description of the log type (HST)
> yyddd Is the Julian date of the first message in the log version
> n Is a sequence number within the Julian date
> (A through Z and 0 through 9)
(IBM InfoCenter)

which tells me they would only break chronological sequence if they somehow crossed a century boundary, which is (to say the least) unlikely to happen again within the product life of IBM midrange systems.


amazon.com ads help fund midrange.com operations

This thread ...


Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page