Paul Therrien wrote:
No, it cannot.
to which I replied (after only a preliminary test):
> Thanks. But Mr. Yeung gave me an idea: two separate fields, coincident
> on the screen in the DSPF, and made coincident in the program as part
> of a DS, conditioned on my indicator, with one VALUES clause for one,
> and the other for the other.
> And THAT does appear to work.
OOPS! No such luck. I do have to deal with the fields individually in