× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Shannon, I posted one in my first email on this thread:

xxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Luis, would you have the RFC number handy? I guess I can search for
it, but I'm just about to get my beauty sleep...

I have tried this with MAILTOOL Plus, which bypasses the IBM SMTP
server and it works. It also works using gmail.

Interesting links here now that I knew what to search for.. IBM seems
to be 1 off from the max link of the local part of the address:

http://isemail.info/xxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxx%40bvstools.com

which doesn't work with QtmSendMail

vs

http://isemail.info/xxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxxx%40bvstools.com

which fails the RFC and also won't work with QtmmSend Mail

Brad
www.bvstools.com


On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Shannon ODonnell
<sodonnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What name would be longer than 63 characters?

Do you have an example?

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bradley Stone
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:54 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Anyone using QtmmSendEmail... a favor... :)

Let me explain my reasoning for this.. it's kinda wacky.

I (actually a customer of mine) has found that an email address with the
length of the string before the @ of greater than 63 charaters will throw a
cpf3c17 in the QtmmSendMail api (I'm on V5R4).

At first we thought it was the total length of the address, but after
playing around found it was instead the length of the address before the @
sign that made the error happen.

That's why in the two email address examples I gave the first should fail
and the second should work.  So I'm hoping someone using MMAIL or something
else home grown that calls the QtmmSendMail api can maybe verify or shoot
this theory down.

Thanks!

Brad
www.bvstools.com
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.