|
Booth,
I believe you are on track. The 'Huggable Luggable' was great for demo's and shows and such but that's a small market. With all the bandwidth available today that market is satisfied by remote access. For the developers there is some potential gain in this but a small market once more. This market too will largely be swallowed up with V6R1 as it can host virtual i5/OS partitions. So each developer who wants one can have a partition of their own for 1/10th of a processor and a couple GB of memory and some disk space. No way that's gonna be more expensive than an entire system unit plus dasd plus tape and it's own copy of i5/OS with maintenance and SWMA. The promised Blade implementation may also address this space as well.
Would IBM like to be able to sell you this desktop developer system? I'm positive they would! Is there a business case for building it? I don't think so.
- Larry
Booth Martin wrote:
I am still not sure I understand the business case for a desktop unit. Portability, for marketing I suppose? But after that very small need, then what? Besides, if the goal is portability then why not a laptop?
If the battle is for price alone, then other solutions seem quicker/easier/more responsive?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.