Here! Here!
Just last week a coworker was sure that he had a security limitation that
was causing him an issue with a canned software package. It did a
deletion of a user space and then did a creation. Apparently IBM lumped
too damned many possibilities in the message for the deletion of a user
space (second level text for CPF2125 indicates that it may either be a
security failure, or it did not exist, etc - how stupid can you get?)
Now, in this case, IBM got lazy and decided to make it harder to do an
appropriate monmsg.
Rob Berendt
