|
Perhaps they could implement pricing whereby you only paid for the amount of interactive CPW you needed. :) Andy > Regarding this issue: > > IBM tells me that they are getting away with the new "Standard" models > with > no interactive, and "Enterprise" models with full interactive. (I hear > customers with low interactive screaming, but IBM seems to be deaf.) > > This is a huge understatement. If you have minimal interactive now be > prepared to pay through the nose for a maximum amount of CPW that you > will > never use in most cases. IBM is doing their best to sweep this under > the > carpet but hopefully more customers, as they begin to upgrade, will > realize > how bad this deal is and will complain. My guess is that Rochester > will > continue to turn their backs but all we can do is complain. > > > Paul Fenstermacher, AS/400 Certified System Administrator
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.