|
DAsmussen@aol.com wrote: > What DOES concern me is > the impact of Y2K in the former Soviet republics. I forsee problems, not as gloomy an outlook as you may predict, but bigger than ours. I suspect, though, that locally run businesses rely less on computers than the average US busineses, and the foreign owned ones will bring in their own solutions. The Russians were, are, and I suspect always will be, very resourceful. After all of the joint space missions between them and nasa, some of the russian "secrets" are coming out - their spacecraft are decidedly "low-tech" by nasa standards, but remarkably functional and inovative in design. They have had to do more with less thoughout history, and they are very good at it. > The latter were old "cold war" analogies (and I shudder to > realize that there are actually people that would take them seriously as a > whole), but an economy totally collapsed by Y2K issues would be fertile > ground for an insane nationalist to take power. Pure conjecture and somewhat > paranoic, but food for thought. Germany wasn't doing so well when Hitler > took power... I always took the cold war seriously. I was also sure that they were just as afraid of us as we were of them. and, yes, this gave me some measure of comfort. But problems will occur, and I'm sure this will only bolster the ultra-nationalists. Russia is already fertile ground for insane nationalists. I don't remember his name, but a few years back a general who advocated taking Alaska back from us, and nuking another neighbor (again my memory is a little fuzzy), got a very significant portion of the popular vote, and it was only after a third candidate quit and endorsed Yeltsin, was the election outcome certain. This scares me more than some glitch in the software that will cause all of the missiles to launch on jan 1, 2000 - I doubt very seriously that they would overlook something so important. If the Russian people decide that their "experiments" in democracy and free market economics are a failure, and decide to throw the reformist out due to this percieved failure, this would be a real threat. > Any knowlegeable insight (Dave?) would be appreciated. Just my .02 worth, definately not inside info. Regards, rick * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the Midrange System Mailing List! To submit a new message, * * send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe from * * this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message. Questions * * should be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.