Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ibm_db node module and IBM Data Server Driver

Regardless of CGI better or Node better in the i, supported by the
database Node on i can be better than other platforms.  If CGI is even
better or not, does not change the difference of Node in i with respect
to Node in other server..


On 04/10/2018 02:01 PM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:

Kelly - I have to ask - when you say CGI, just what do you mean?
CGIDEV2 as implemented on IBM i, or the general meaning of CGI as
"common gateway interface"?

So far as I know, everything that writes interactive apps to the web
is using CGI in the latter sense. PHP, ASP.Net, classic ASP, CGIDEV2,
the CGI APIs on IBM i, they all generate a text stream with the
various CGI operations (whatever they're to be called).

So I'm just looking for some clarification, if you please!!

Vern

On 4/10/2018 10:20 AM, Kelly Cookson wrote:

I doubt that node runs better on other servers than on the IBM i.

I was thinking this:

1.     Node has better performance than CGI under conditions of very
high concurrency.

2.     Because of how node was ported to IBM i, it performs no better
than CGI.

3.     Therefore, to get the best performance with node, run it on
servers other than IBM i.

I actually suspect that #2 above is false. That would mean #3 does
not follow. But if #1 and #2 above are true, then, to my mind, #3
makes sense.

Thanks,

Kelly Cookson
IT Project Leader
Dot Foods, Inc.
217-773-4486 ext. 12676
www.dotfoods.com<http://www.dotfoods.com>
.

-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color --
-- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --