×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
From: Maurice O'Prey
Nathan
If you are experiencing performance issues have you explored the
types of server side data caching offered by the IBMi? Are there any?
I'm getting GREAT performance on IBM i!
But now I'm wondering why anyone might be thinking otherwise. Maybe I'm unable to communicate coherently ;-)
The ONLY performance issues I have experience in the course of this thread are entirely on the client side, parsing and loading SQL result sets into client objects. An SQL result set may be returned in 1/10th of a second (that includes download time over a LAN), then it may take 8 seconds to parse and load it into a client object (a Visual Foxpro table or an IBM i Access View object).
Why would we be concerned about differences between IBM i CGI/XML and QZDASOINT/ODBC? The differences in performances are TINY in comparison to the performance of Windows clients!
-Nathan
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
