|
From: Paul Tuohy
I think language efficiency comes well down the list after the hardware
Let's say that part of scalability is the "ability" to effectively use the "hardware". Here's an analogy. Let's say we're operating a restaurant where waiters take orders for "sodas" from customers, while sitting at their tables. Waiters then go to a soda fountain to fill up cups and return them to tables. Let's say the soda fountain has 64 dispensers which can output any available flavor. The process is automated so that all dispensers can be working, serving all waiters simultaneously.
Sometime later, management decides to add a staging area for soda orders, which is manned by 4 workers. Waiters go to the staging area and place their orders there. A staging area worker takes the order to the soda fountain, returns with cups full of soda, empties the contents into other cups, discards the original cups, and waiters finally return orders to tables. Every once in a while one of the staging area workers is dispatched to collect garbage.
Which operation is more efficient? Which operation is more scalable? Which operation is more likely to retain (please) customers?
The soda fountain is a 64 core IBM i server. The staging area is a 4 core Intel server, running J2EE application servers. Customer tables are browsers.
-Nathan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.