Re: Consumer Based Web Development

We could install Java 6. It's available on 5.4 and 6.1 which most of our
customers are on. I would like to move to it anyway since Java SE 5 (at
least Sun's implementation) is EOL.

I haven't tried to install GlassFish at all. I assume it would have to use
PASE and that is not my strong point. I should just try it though and see
what happens. We have a development box at 6.1 and it has Java SE 6
installed.

--
James R. Perkins
http://twitter.com/the_jamezp


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 13:19, Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

James Perkins skrev:

Thorbjorn,
I Would love to be able to use JSF 2, but so far we are developing for
WebSphere Application Server 6.1 which is not Java EE 5 compliant. I will

be

using Facelets, so it should ease my pain a bit.

Our JSF application runs under Tomcat and we drag in the JSF-libraries
ourselves. Most likely something similar is possible with JSF 2.0 even
under an older EE server.

We are about to do maintainance on it. Hopefully I can get around to do
some real life work with JSF 2 and report back.

Our basic requirements are:
It has to run on the IBM i
It needs to use standards for easy migration (hopefully) in the future

Sounds reasonable to me :)

I guess that's about it. I would love to be able to get GlassFish running

on

the i. Then we could use Java EE 6 :-)

GlassFish 3 requires AFAIK Java 6. You got that?

Perhaps a wish to bring up on the java400 list?

--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus... Tubular Bells!"

--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.