Re: Portlets and the AS400 -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Portlets and the AS400
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thunderaxiom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:57:32 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Haas, Matt (CL Tech Sv) skrev den 29-06-2009 23:24:

I have not done formal benchmarks but there is a noticeable difference. I have about dozen Java apps

I do not doubt it. I am just very curious about what performance things people have noticed and how they were fixed.

So you use the native driver when running on the i?

Would the difference in timing be explainable by having to transfer the request and answer over the network to the Windows machine?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Portlets and the AS400 , Vern Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.