|
Any particular reason for doing so? I chose the Hibernate path due to the maturity of the Hibernate project, and the available online resources for the underlying engine, but was pleased to see that there was a choice for JPA implementation (which is incredibly important when you need to select a technology which may have to be maintained for many years). The more implementations the less chance for them all to wither :D
Thorbjørn wrote:
I have just finished refreshing my Java knowledge and found that theJava Persistance Arcitechture (JPA) defined in EJB3 can run on non-J2EE
servers (plain web containers or stand-alone applications) and is very
powerful. It allows for simple paging by setting the "start at" and
"give me X items" on each query, and then letting the persistence layer
deal with asking the database properly.
Let me also suggest looking at Eclipselink implementation of JPA. It is based on the TopLink code base donated by Oracle.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.