|
I am not trying to poke fun at EGL, but I have been using JSF for about fourThe ease-of-use statements have until now had nothing to do with JSF validation. Frankly I could do the entire development cycle without using JSF validation. Yes, it will be nice if some of those features can be used, but as I've said all along, the real validation has to be done on the host, anyway.
years and have been through many mud puddles with it. That is why I have
been so skeptical of the ease-of-use statements being made about EGL.
I amI really wish you'd use some terms that were a little more professional in nature. But hey, when in Rome...
waiting until somebody actually develops a medium sized application (let's
say 100+ JSF pages) to see if EGL addressed some of those "bummers"
and toAgain, all of the features I've shown prior to today are "out of the box" features that kick the living crap out of even Nathan's frameworks, much less vanilla RPG-CGI. Today was just another set of features that EGL/JSF does very well. Can you show us your version of the programs we did today so that we can look for "bummers" in your code?
see if that person developing a medium app still uses the same
out-of-the-box features at that point or strayed away from them because they
could save more time by "spinning their own wool" for certain portions
(which is what I have done).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.