Re: Impressions of EGL - Part Duex -- WEB400

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Impressions of EGL - Part Duex
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe Pluta wrote:
Both Stone and Andelin say that effective use of RPG-CGI
also requires knowledge of HTML, JavaScript, CSS, and the
Document Object Model.

"effective use" are your words which don't take into account what I also said about AJAX libraries and tools for generating HTML, JavaScript and RPG from predefined models which are effective too, and available from a number of different sources.

It was interesting to me to compare HTML with JSF. And compare HTML tags with JSF tags. If it's a choice of one or the other, I'll stick with HTML. I don't see the value of an additional intermediate tag language, particularly if you end up needing to mix HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with JSF.

Nathan.

Follow-Ups:

Re: JSF vs HTML , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.