|
Crispin wrote:Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 5/20/2008 13:59 >>>
Sorry David, but I have to disagree with you :-)And it seems to work pretty well, actually. Actually, the small amount
Of course without a good understanding of the generated code, trying to
fix problems in the code is going to be a nightmare.
Sure, but you certainly SHOULD NOT be modifying the generated code. You
SHOULD BE going back to the tool and resolving the bug at the higher level
generators afford you.
And that's why we're arguing about which technology is better to get aI hate badly written code that I can do myself easier and/or more
business application to the Web, rather than getting it there. I've used
generators for almost 20 years. I write WinC/Java/5250/HTML clients. I write
JDBC/ODBC/SQL Server/DB2 backends. I put the business logic where it makes
sense. I can change where each piece goes on a whim.
I don't care that I use a tool. I use the tool to get the job done. I cared
when I first looked at generated code 18 years ago, because I was an RPG
coder, and I wanted to keep my job as a programmer. I see too many people
get defensive when it comes to something else writing the code for them. I
think these people need to get over it.
Just My Opinion :-)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.