|
Thanks for posting Bob. Based on your last comment:modern
<Bob>IBM's position is clear, we offer two very distinct paths to
Weband
development: Java and EGL. The System i is computer platform that
supports
many other alternatives and those choices are also available to our
customers. We hope customers choose the IBM path...</Bob>
It appears as though there is awkward alignment between the software
hardware divisions, because Java/EGL carry a mantra of platformlooking
independence. What does System i hardware offer the shop that is
tomore
move on from RPG and lessen costs overall (i.e. moving to potentially
effiecient development with EGL and moving their application stack toa
highintriguing -
powered, less expensive, Wintel/Linux server).
Being that the applications are running in an OS agnostic app server
(WAS/Tomcat/Geronimo/etc), and being that those app servers don't
necessary
have any intimate connections to the OS/DB that would make it
why would you envision people staying on System i5 hardware?division
Maybe a better question to ask would be, how is the IBM software
helping to sell *new* System i5 hardware to *new* customers? Onething I
could see as a benefit is the ability to have many LPARs that areOn
scaleable
past what an Enterprise Wintel machine can support.
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Behalf Of Bob Cancillaalso
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 9:25 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] The Truth About EGL
Trevor,
The facts are the facts. We have a significant population of RPG
developers
and customers have a huge inventory of RPG applications. RPG has a
healthy
future for at least 10 years. I cannot see beyond that point. It is
abulk
fact that we are seeing a major decline in RPG programmers with the
ofcan
the population nearing retirement age and very few new young people
entering
the population. This is not my view point, look at Gartner and other
analysts. Can we turn this around? Should we turn this around? I
assure you that IBM and I myself are committed to insuring that weprotect
our customer's investment in RPG and that is a fact. We are takingsome
specific steps to insure that we can provide that investmentprotection on
an ongoing basis. I will talk much more about this after our Januarymarket
announcement when I am free to talk about our repackaging of System i
tools
and compilers.
Trevor I do not know the future of RPG. I see what I see in the
which is a decline in the number of programmers and an increase in thetechnologies.
number of customers asking us to help them migrate to other
You can absolutely be assured that as long as customers continue touse
RPGRPG,
and want to use it, that we will support and enhance it.
As far as EGL goes, I think folks should begin to use it along with
notWeb
in place of. I've looked carefully at the requests for an RPG based
UIin
and feel that EGL meets the requirements that customers have set forth
this area. There certainly was elegance and simplicity in onelanguage
thatthat
could do it all and that is also a fact. Unfortunately I do not see
day coming back anytime soon. I think it is now a time where you mustRPG
pick
multiple tools to get the job done. EGL is one choice, it is the IBM
recommended strategic choice. There are most definitely alternative
solutions available today from other vendors and/or the open source
community.
Choices are based on our customers budgets, staffing constraints, and
demands of the business as well as the customer's tolerance of risk.
IBM's
position is clear, we offer two very distinct paths to modern Web
development: Java and EGL. The System i is computer platform that
supports
many other alternatives and those choices are also available to our
customers. We hope customers choose the IBM path...
On Dec 18, 2007 6:41 AM, Trevor Perry <trevor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob,
This paragraph is the reason why people consider that you are saying
theiris
dead. While you may not use the words, your intent is clear.
Out here in the real world, customers are not universally asking for
migration from RPG. There are many customers who wish to leverage
RPGinvestment in RPG and their staff, and would love to see you extend
IBM.beyond a green screen language.weekend.
And, btw, thanks for your offlist reply to my question from this
I
appreciate your consideration, and I appreciate you speaking for
been
Trevor
On 12/18/07 9:24 AM, "Bob Cancilla" <bob.cancilla@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Look RPG is an outstanding language and better than it has ever
atbeyond,
the
V5R4 level of the language and will be even better at V6R1 and
orbut
facts are facts. It is an old language and no amount of wishing
saidmarketing will turn it into a popular modern language. RPG as I
howeverbefore
has at least a strong 10 year life, maybe much longer. It is
onor
the
decline. Just look around your shop. How many young people (20's
eventhat
30's) do you have in the shop? Who is teaching RPG? or COBOL for
matter.
--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
--
Bob Cancilla
System i Software Evangelist
IBM Rational Tools System i/z Strategy/Enablement
email: rcancill@xxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.