Re: Ruby On Rails on the iSeries -- WEB400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Ruby On Rails on the iSeries
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 17:41:56 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

.Net developers rely on MS  Visual Studio to integrate and simplify...


Well some might... But for the record we've dropped Ajax (usually using
http://prototype.conio.net/) into existing .NET apps w/out a problem.
We've also done it to classic ASP apps.

The problem isn't .NET (or Java, or PHP, or ...) it's the bloody
framework that sits ontop and believes that it is all knowing and all
seeing. I've got to agree w/Mike E's comment about frameworks, they're
cool to start, but eventually you end up fighting them.

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.