|
CGI doesn't always scale well? Under what conditions? RPG is the native, fast way to do anything on the 400. In general, I have seen RPG-CGI scale better than JSP. If it's the same box, and the same type of application, you will be able to put more users on it, if it's written in RPG compared to Java. Seth Newton snewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Profound Logic Software, Inc. Toll-Free: (877) 224-7768 x115 Fax: (603) 849-7757 RPGsp - iSeries Web Development has never been this easy! Watch video demos: http://www.profoundlogic.com/video_demos/ -----Original Message----- date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:59:34 -0400 from: "Mike Eovino" <meovino@xxxxxxxxx> subject: Re: [WEB400] CGI vs JSP... CGI - Pros: You probably already know RPG. Easy to start with. CGI - Cons: Doesn't always scale well. Locks you into using iSeries as your webserver and as your back-end. HTTP server and web application must be in same tier. Tough to hire people that know anything about RPG-CGI. JSP Pros: Easy to find people who know it. Can run web app tier on just about any platform. Can connect to multiple back-end databases. Can separate HTTP server tier from web app tier. Lots of open-source resources. JSP Cons: You probably don't know it. Can be tough to get started if you don't have an experienced Java person.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.