|
Aaron, To answer your first question... Yes, as most of our applications are RPG. But that's not the point of the part of my statement you quoted. The upshot of my point is... move away from native access and to SQL, if you want to compete and be taken seriously in the RDBMS world. This same sort of conversation happened in the 1970's in the IBM mainframe world [SQL and DB2 vs. DL/1 calls, VSAM, etc.], but they realized that if they wanted to be a part of the RDBMS market place(and they needed to in order to compete against ORACLE, etc.), they had to standardize on SQL against DB2 and convert existing apps or move to SQL with new. Single record access with SQL... While you're correct about SQL being good for set processing, single record processing is VERY fast, IF you build the table and indexes AND application to maximize for transaction processing; done all the time by VERY LARGE DB2 applications, at least on the mainframe. And, I know it can be true on the iSeries... all the essential elements are there but the faithful have to move in the modern direction. IBM realizes this and is on a campaign to move the faithful to SQL and the real DB2 world (no more files and fields and non-SQL access. Mainly, Tables and Columns and SQL). But, again, my major point is... to compete, the iSeries and its followers have to become devotes and practitioners of really using DB2 and SQL or it the iSeries WILL fade away to, at best, a LINUX box running utility apps or an AIX box with ORACLE. At worst, it will be out the door, replaced by Microsoft and SQL Server or some UNIX-flavor with ORACLE. If that is the case, just about everyone that likes the iSeries, loses. Take care, Dave >>> albartell@xxxxxxxxx 2/23/2006 15:00:04 >>> > move to using mainstream languages (SQL for sure) and programming methodologies. This statement leads me to believe that you have not used RPG native DB access. Have you? With RPG, SQL can enhance native DB access, but it is definitely not a replacement. >Not true about SQL being slower access than RPG. SQL works great for result sets but I would have a hard time believing that single record SQL access is as fast as RPG native DB access. Maybe things have changed and my brain data is old though. Aaron Bartell -----Original Message----- From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Odom Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:34 PM To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [WEB400] native PHP in V5R4??? Not true about SQL being slower access than RPG. But the bigger picture is if the platform is to compete seriously in the market place against other DBMS platforms it is imperative those using legacy programming languages (RPG, CL, etc.) move to using mainstream languages (SQL for sure) and programming methodologies. Sincerely, David Odom >>> MCUNNING@xxxxxxx 2/23/2006 12:31:30 >>> Explain the easier comment for accessing DB2 ? CGIDEV uses native RPG Database IO that in my opinion is faster and easier and gives you more control that other methods like SQL. >>> gmagnuson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2/23/2006 2:07:21 PM >>> Eric Kempter wrote (in part...) >> Are we in effect asking for a native version of UNIX rather than just >>PHP? I look forward to reading everyone's opinion. I see PHP as a form of DDS-5250 replacement... (yes, it is so much more...) I see that PHP pushes And pulls from the DB2 database so much easier than CGIDEV. My $.02 worth Gerald -- This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. -- This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.