|
Matt,
Yeah, I checked that earlier, the non-DB page rate is just over 100.
Right now the partition is only getting about 768MB of memory and it does
not have a full processor allocated.
I personally think beefing up this partition will make things better. I am
looking for opinions like yours to help me plead my case.
However, our remote locations all have terrible PC's in place, Pentium 2's
and 3's running Win98. I think this is another big part of the problem.
But I don't think a (mostly) Windows guy like me is going to sell the
thought of buying new pc's to the rest of the gang in my 400 shop.
The PC's have caused all sorts of grief, especially printing. Even though
the download for IBM's AFP viewer says that it supports Win98, believe me
it does not.
I switched over to TIFF for printing, works great on one 98 machine, but
then on the other machine I have to save files to hard drive before
viewing the TIFF's, otherwise I get an invalid document name when it tries
to open it. Right now I am having our folks jump through hoops to get
their reports printing.
PDF should work, but I get errors because some java classes are missing,
it looks like it is looking for classes on the 400 that I am pointing them
to, but this 400 is not even running iSeries for Web, which I assume is
why the PDF server could not start. Then again, PDF's might turn out to be
slower on PC's that I am dealing with...........
Dave Reiher
System Analyst
Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate
Ph: 217.854.2547 ext. 254
dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Haas, Matt" <Matt.Haas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/24/2005 09:10 AM
Please respond to
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [WEB400] WAS 5.1 Express Performance
Dave,
Did you allocate a full processor to this partition? If not, Java
performance will suffer. How much memory did you allocation? Simple apps
need at least 1 GB for decent performance. Watch the non-DB page rate on
WRKSYSSTS. IBM says keep it under 100 for best performance.
Is performance okay locally? If it's remote people having problems, it
may just be limitations of the connection they are using or network
configuration issues.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Dave Reiher/prairiefarms
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:59 AM
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WEB400] WAS 5.1 Express Performance
Anyone have any thoughts or know of any good resources on fine tuning
WAS
5.1 Express Application server performance?
I am running iSeries for Web on a small partition here, in my config for
iSeries for Web I am redirecting to another AS400 off site. It just
seems
to run a little bit slow for our folks in the field. Is there anything I
can do to fine tune the performance? Would throwing more resources at my
partition do any good? The performance doesn't seem to take a hit on the
400 partition except when starting or stopping an instance. I hate buy
more memory or allocate more only to infd out it doesn't do me any good.
Any thoughts??
Dave Reiher
System Analyst
Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate
Ph: 217.854.2547 ext. 254
dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.