|
Based on your comments below, could there simply be paging issues because of the inordinately large amount of memory being used? -----Original Message----- From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of web400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:44 PM To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries Subject: Re: [WEB400] Tweaking FTP file transfers > We have a need to FTP several large files nightly to one of our vendors. > These files are 350K and up and at times take hours to FTP from our 400 to > the remote server yet if we place these files on a Wintel box, they'll FTP > in minutes. Hmmm... why would it matter whether they're coming from Windows or an iSeries? Have you tested the connection between your iSeries and it's gateway to see if you receive packet loss? A ping flood (during off-hours) might be a good test. If your performance is that much worse than a Windows machine, I'd have to assume that there's a hardware problem -- or a gross misconfiguration. > I'm wondering what on the AS/400 could be tweaked to improve the > transmission time. Two things I've been looking at are the TCP send and > receive buffer sizes which are currently set to 1,000,000 (default value is > 8,192). Although that's a colossal waste of memory, I don't see how it would cause slowdowns. (You do understand that that isn't a system-wide setting, right? It's a per-socket setting. If you have 1000 active sockets, you'll have 2gb of memory in use!) > Also I've found some jobs lingering in QSYSWRK, QTFTPxxxxx which > run at priority 25. I could drop the class down to something equal to or > lower than my interactive subsystem but I'm not quite sure what these jobs > do and if changing their priority really would do anything. Those are FTP server jobs. I understood from your message that your iSeries was acting as a client, not a server. If that's the case, those jobs are completely irrelevant. Like I said, I'd be looking for a hardware problem. (Dropped packets, corrupted packets, bad cable) or I'd be looking for a misconfigured interface (MTU set too low, duplex set incorrectly, etc)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.