|
Walden, What would happen to a Wintel box if a .EXE file were loaded and run for every person that connected to the site? How long would take long before the entire system was destablized? They call that architecture CGI. Although OS/400 CGI is perhaps an order of magnitude more efficient and stable than its Wintel counterpart, it has its limits. The obvious answer is to choose a more scalable architecture. Although Wintel and Lintel server farms (running ASPs and Servlets) do offer a scalable alternative, they also come with an extra, unnecessary system deployment and management cost. With Relational-Web, RPG programs can generate and return fully formatted HTML streams to an end-user, nearly as efficiently, as OS/400 can generate and return an ODBC or JDBC formatted stream to a server farm (which then must convert the data into HTML). A scalable ILE architecture simply requires less work to develop, deploy, and maintain. Unfortunately, most people don't realize it. It seems that most OS/400 shops do deploy Active Server Pages, Servlets, or equivalent Wintel and Lintel solutions. But there are native OS/400 alternatives which are just as scalable. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com> To: <web400@midrange.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:39 AM Subject: RE: [WEB400] What happened to rpgenerationx.com? > OK, I know I'm going to regret this, but... > > Given this thread (and others like it on Midrange and Ignite) can someone > please explain to me again why having one iSeries box (you know the one that > never crashes) as my web server is better than a farm of cheap Linux or > Windows Intel boxes serving your web? > > This isn't the first time (more like 10+) that people have complained about > the stability of the iSeries as a web server. Why do people keep using it? > Aren't Bob, Bleddyn, David, Andrew, etc. supposed to be the experts at this? > If they have such a problem, what't up? > > I love the stability of the iSeries for database and green screen, but I > must say that I think web serving is best left to web servers that have > millions of installations. > > -Walden > > PS. Andrew, your just the lucky post I'm replying to, my comments apply to > the entire thread. > > > ------------ > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.