RE: [WEB400] ILE questions: activation groups, rpg-cgi, classic web server.

["Bob Cozzi \(RPGIV\)" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx>]

The biggest issue here, is that *NEW causes the activation group to be
created each time the program or service program is used in a job. Not
each time a procedure is called within a service program, but each time
the program that uses the service program is created.

A named activation group is somewhat "static". And is reused each time
the program is called.

Bob Cozzi
cozzi@rpgiv.com
Visit the on-line  Midrange  Developer  forum at: http://www.rpgiv.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: web400-admin@midrange.com [mailto:web400-admin@midrange.com] On
Behalf
> Of Phil Groschwitz
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:26 PM
> To: web400@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: [WEB400] ILE questions: activation groups, rpg-cgi,
classic web
> server.
>
> >
> > What do you mean by "run out of memory"?  Wouldn't all resources
allocated
> > by the program be released, and the *new activation group be
deleted, when
> > the CGI program ended?
> >
> > Nathan M. Andelin
> > www.relational-data.com
> >
>
> I looked it up and apparently I'm wrong.  It was so long ago that I
can't be
> sure of the reason for using named (as opposed to *new) activation
groups
> but I thought it was that the system wasn't releasing resources.
>
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.