RE: ILE questions: activation groups, rpg-cgi, classic web server. -- WEB400

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: [WEB400] ILE questions: activation groups, rpg-cgi, classic web server.
From: "Phil Groschwitz" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 20:30:12 -0500
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>
> my questions:
>
> I'm really not very hip on activation groups.  Should I use
> named, *caller,
> *new, or default activation groups?  What are the ramifications of each?
> (it all seems to work fine using default).

I use named activation groups for pgms and *caller for service pgms.  *new
would cause a new activation group to be created each time the pgm is
called.  You'd eventually run out of memory.

Phil

Follow-Ups:

Re: ILE questions: activation groups, rpg-cgi, classic web server. , Nathan M. Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.