|
>Again, if VAJ is going away, we may need to get going on eclipse.... What? VAJ is going away? Who is saying that? and what is eclipse? Aaron Bartell -----Original Message----- From: Eyers, Daniel [mailto:daniel.eyers@honeywell.com] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:34 PM To: 'web400@midrange.com' Subject: RE: [WEB400] Upgrading to V5R1 So what's the consensus? Go with Apache or stick to HTTP Server? My feel is that if IBM is going to phase out HTTP Server, Apache makes sense..... Along the same lines, anyone have any feedback on the eclipse project??? Again, if VAJ is going away, we may need to get going on eclipse.... thanks dan -----Original Message----- From: Mel Rothman [mailto:mel@rothmanweb.com] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:28 PM To: web400@midrange.com Subject: Re: [WEB400] Upgrading to V5R1 Brad, a couple of days ago the lead developer of the HTTP Server Powered by Apache told me that since the PTFs released last September and October, CGI performance of the pbA server has been at least equal to that of the classic server. My subjective experiences on lightly loaded machines is that the two servers' CGI performance is comparable. Mel Rothman IBM eServer Custom Technology Center (CTC), Rochester, Minnesota http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/ctc/ Brad Stone wrote: > > I reccomend to stay away from the pbA server until they get > the CGI performance up to par. It's horrific compared to > Classic. > > just my .02. > > Brad > www.bvstools.com > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:10:02 -0500 > "Joel R. Cochran" <jrc@masi-brac.com> wrote: > > If you do this (which we did some time ago) be sure you > > have absolutely ALL > > available cumulative PTFs and Group PTFs for the HTTP > > server. When you > > configure it, go ahead and switch over to the "Powered by > > Apache" Server. > > It's not that you really get any immediate benefit, but > > as I understand it > > that is where all the future enhancements will be and a > > new OS is the > > easiest time to switch. Also it will open the door for > > using Tomcat and you > > no longer have to track seperate Server Instance and > > Server Configuration > > names. > > > > Our V5R1 Internet Server box is a real champ... no > > significant problems here > > once configured properly (it is a little pickier than the > > previous version). > > > > Best Luck, > > > > Joel R. Cochran > > Director of Internet Services > > VamaNet.com > > (800)480-8810 > > mailto:custservice@vamanet.com _______________________________________________ This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. _______________________________________________ This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.