|
> From: Buck Calabro > > Almost anything else requires that we either abandon the model > and work with > the generated code (I'll slit my wrists first!) <ROFL!> > or that we re-work the > source code changes when we regenerate objects (due to changes). Definitely an issue with CASE tools. If I could figure out how to get around this particular problem, I would. Unforunately, IBM won't expose hooks to the display file, so we're stuck. It's either work at the 5250 data stream level (and I quote, "I'll slit my wrists first!"), or modify the source. > Additionally, there's a learning curve to setting up > HTML/jsp/asp/what have > you that we aren't immediately prepared to scale. If WebFacing > doesn't pan > out we'll obviously have to broaden our horizons, and when that happens > PSC400 will definitely merit a look-see. Agreed. Even though the HTML knowledge required to use PSC400 is pretty low, it's not zero (well, the green screen emulation version is zero, but the "prettier" web application version requires a little). Personally, I think PSC400 is easier to use than WebFacing - you run two commands and then edit the generated HTML as needed - but then again I'm pretty biased <grin>. Anyway, good luck in your endeavors! Keep us posted. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.