|
Evan, You'll have to explain more what you are talking about. I'm talking data, it sounds like you're talking system settings, etc. Again, you need to decide which is the lesser of two evils. Being down for an hour to do a system save once a month, or not being able to restore if your machine crashes. I choose the first. No amount of reasoning will be able to convince me that doing that one hour a month to do backups is more important than the customer wanting 24/7 no matter what, even if it means total disaster and the inability to get anything back. Of course, if the customer was so blind that they didn't think of that, I would specifically put in my contract that they declined the backup option and that any rebuilding of the system as a result of a crash would be charged triple time rates. Brad > Brad > > To be honest I meant a system rebuild :) If anyone still does > these these > days. I take it from your comments that the webserver is > easily rebuilt > somehow, and from that point of view, a recovery could be > accomplished > using scripts that rebuild things rather than restoring. Recovery and > restore are not necessarily the same thing even though the > point is often > missed +--- | This is the WEB400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to WEB400@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to WEB400-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.