Re: RNF0257

Hi Daniel,

strangely enough the characters are not shifted in 9.8, but they are in 9.9.

And I agree that they should be removed. I tried creating an RDi plugin
that would do that (asking Gemini for help) but it didn't work.

According to Gemini this is because the editor is in ASCII whereas the
sources are in EBCDIC.

For the time being I'll just rely on the work-around.

Thanks

Peter
--

Peter Colpaert

Peter.Colpaert@xxxxxxxxx


Op vr 20 feb 2026 om 12:30 schreef Daniel Gross <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:

This shift only looks like that - in fact LPEX tries to display those
undisplayable chars, and fails.

If you press backspace once - it should be only one step.

Best practice is, to remove those color codes completely, as neither RDi
nor VS Code can display it.

HTH
Daniel

Am 20.02.2026 um 12:20 schrieb Peter Colpaert <peter.colpaert@xxxxxxxxx
:

Hi Daniel,

the workaround suggested in the defect indeed solves the RNF0257 errors.

I do notice that the comment-lines-with-codes are still shifted one
character to the left: the * is in column 6 instead of 7. Strangely

enough

this doesn't trigger a syntax error, whereas it does if I manually put a

*

in column 6.

But for the time being my issue seems to be gone.

Thanks for the help!

Best regards,

Peter
--

Peter Colpaert

Peter.Colpaert@xxxxxxxxx


Op vr 20 feb 2026 om 08:13 schreef Daniel Gross <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:

There is an unresolved issue with the parser:

https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/defect/aCIgJ0000009zib/dt461825?language=en_US

Also affects sources with national language characters.

HTH
Daniel

Am 20.02.2026 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Colpaert <

peter.colpaert@xxxxxxxxx

:

Hi all,

I switched to RDi 9.9 a few days after it came out, and I've noticed

some

strange difference with 9.8.

Our RPGLE sources contain lots of coloured comments (using low hex
characters) and since upgrading to version 9.9 these are flagged with

the

errors above when validating or even when editing source. Automatic

syntax

checking is on.

Also the lines where such colour codes are present, are shifted one
character to the left, which I think is causing the errors.

Compilation does work so it's clearly a parser and/or verifier problem.

The exact same source will validate just fine in 9.8.

I compared the configurations for both versions of RDi but can't find

any

difference. FWIW I copied my 9.8 workspace for use in 9.9.

Any clue as to what I can do about this?

Thanks in advance.

Peter
--

Peter Colpaert

Peter.Colpaert@xxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.