× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I thought we were paying him?

When I first joined up he sent me a PM saying we all needed to chip in $10
per month for his voice of reason.

Don't tell me I'm the only one doing this?


On 17 August 2018 at 18:04, Edmund Reinhardt <edmund.reinhardt@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Excellent explanation Buck, we should be paying you :-)


----- Original message -----
From: Paul Therrien <paultherrien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Officially the weirdest thing I've seen in RDi
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2018 9:19 AM

+1 ... for your patient tutoring.

(although, I still have not tried to implement iProjects)

Paul

On 2018-08-17 08:51, Buck Calabro wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 07:49, Ken Killian <kkillian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>> Sadly, I have used iProjects. And it has burned me....
>
> Ken, your note is like a time machine of my life. I can very much
> imagine myself writing this exact thing 20 years ago - I might even
> have done, for all I know. My current self is different to that
> earlier self, and I'd like to take the opportunity to write a note,
> put it in the TARDIS, and deliver it to my past self so I could...
get
> past this block. Here is my message in a Klein Bottle:
>
> Younger Buck,
> It happened again. You've use iProjects to group all the source
> members for a particular mod in one place, pushed it to production,
> and the debugger insists on referring to the old source in the
> iProject. That frustrates the heck out of you and you've sworn off
> iProjects as the crappiest crap ever put into IBM software.
>
> Don't be so hasty. There's nothing wrong with iProjects - the
problem
> is you. Wait, don't stop reading yet. This is your older, wiser
self
> here - you best take my advice. I'm going to need you to be smarter
> Real Soon Now. But I can't talk about that - spoilers! Yes, I
still
> ramble. I'm working on it. It turns out that you're going to need
> iProjects for... argh. Yes, spoilers.
>
> The problem with iProjects isn't the tool - it's how you're using
it.
> You are right-handed. You can cut with left-handed scissors, but it
> won't turn out well. You'll have deja vu when you learn that lesson
> yourself. iProjects is designed to be a semi-permanent container
for
> your source. It was a good idea to use iProjects to keep track of
all
> the things for the ZIP code expansion project! It was a bad idea to
> assume that the iProject disappeared when you uploaded the source
back
> to production. Let me say that again, with different words, because
> we're still stubborn 20 years later - You can't have the iProject
AND
> the production code in the IDE at the same time. Once more, with
> feeling: If the iProject is done, the source uploaded, iProject not
> needed any more, DELETE THE iPROJECT.
>
> Rule Zero: As long as the iProject is in the IDE, the iProject IS
THE
> CANONICAL, OFFICIAL SOURCE OF RECORD. Edit iProjects, or edit
> production. NEVER, EVER, CROSS THE STREAMS!
> Yes, I'm yelling. We haven't got over that either. Working on
that,
too.
>
> If there's some reason you need to keep the iProject around (like
> having to deploy it on multiple LPARs / customer machines) then
under
> no circumstances should you ever change the code on the IBM side -
> change it in iProjects and push it again. Yes, that seems like a
> pain, but it's up to you to honour Rule Zero at all times - RDi
won't
> magically know that you've done a push and it can now safely ignore
> the iProject forever more.
>
> Well Younger Buck, the TARDIS will only allow a finite number of
> electrons to go back into our past timeline, but I hope you get the
> idea.
>
> Never violate Rule Zero. The space-time continuum depends on that.
> --Older Buck
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development
Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [1]https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [2]https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.




References

Visible links
1. https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
2. https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.