|
Thanks Jim!
So, in essence, no harm, no foul by changing the TCPKEEPALV from 1000 to
15? I apologize if I'm not picking up the obvious from your response, but
I want to make sure I don't introduce problems for already stressed out
developers and testers.
- Dan
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Jim Oberholtzer <
midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
More likely than not wanting any keep alive the person making the changebehaves
(or
asking for it if it was the boss/auditor) did not understand the
ramifications of that specific setting.
We see that all the time, particularly with the weighting on an uncapped
partition definition. That's not a priority, its weighting and it
differently than some folks think.--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.