Re: <No Subject> -- WDSCI-L

Time you got a copy of the Linoma Toolbox Vern and just converted the dang things to D specs/DCLs.

Also I think Craig Rutledge may have an updated version of his free conversions tools now.

On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:41 AM, vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Eric

I just ran into a published limitation - *LIKE DEFINE - and there are a lot in some older code.

Has the fix for that in live outline been included in 9.5? There was a thread here about this around November 2013.

I see I can get around it by turning off live outline update. Will try that.

Vern

On 9/18/2015 8:51 AM, Eric Simpson wrote:

I'll post details shortly.

Thanks,
Eric
Eric Simpson
Rational Developer for i - Rational Developer for
AIX and Linux - Rational Developer for Power
IBM Software Group - Canada Lab
Phone: 905-413-3226 (T/L: 313-3226)
esimpson@xxxxxxxxxx

From: Karl <k.mainville@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/18/2015 09:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

Did someone have the repository address so I can add it to the installation
manager ?

I would like to have the version 9.5. Can I install it via IM 1.8.3 ?

Thank you

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Doug Davie <dougdavie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<TURNOVER vendor response>

Some small changes were required to accommodate the new RDi 9.5.
These were verified against an early release copy, but I still need to
verify against the GA version.
I'm doing that as we speak.
So the version you're running will not work with 9.5, and you'll need to
install the new TURNOVER version when it's ready.
When you're ready, contact our technical support line for an update.

</TURNOVER vendor response>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Ken Killian <kkillian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Concur!!!! Which is why I am drooling over this Latest Greatest RDI

9.5!!

Just hope our CMS (Change Management System) will work effortless with
that new update, when the TR is released in the 4th quarter! We use
Softlanding/Turnover for our CMS.

When creating longer SQL Statements, I hit the Limits of the 8 - 80
Punch-Card Goal post limitations... <Big Frown> I have to split the

line,

and then space over to column 8, for the old punch-card lovers... Yes!
Sadly, they exist! Some twist happy memories of their youth, I guess...

I am SO HAPPY to use an I.D.E. with color syntax, Code-Assist, a single
double-click to fix errors, TODO: Task tags, outline view, etc... I say
GOOD-BYE to C.L.I.!!! <Joy Joy>

This from a 25-year veteran on the IBM i!
And legacy, such as the discontinue OS/400. <smirk>
Steve Perry has taught me well! <Big Geek Grin>

PS. I will bug my system administrator, to see if it is possible to
somehow download the RDI 9.5!!!
<Big Grin>

-Ken Killian-

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kurt
Anderson
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 8:39 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client

for

System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

Hi Ken,

" PS. Be sure to start in column 8, because of Punch Card legacy for
sequence numbers. For when the Developers dropped their punch cards on

the

floor."

Ken, no longer a restriction when you use **FREE in RDi 9.5. Will
probably require a PTF to accompany it so the compiler can handle it as
well.

Kurt Anderson
Sr. Programmer/Analyst - Application Development, Service Delivery

Platform

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken
Killian
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client

for

System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

If you are using free-format control Statement, which replaces the old
punch card spec, that use to be called the H-Spec.

ctl-opt Option( *SrcStmt : *NoDebugIO );

And of course, RDI will provide you with Code-Assist for Free-format

and

also on-line help on this! <Joy Joy>

PS. Be sure to start in column 8, because of Punch Card legacy for
sequence numbers. For when the Developers dropped their punch cards on

the

floor.

This is not needed in Modern/post-punch card languages like Java, C, C+

+,

C#, Python, Objective-C, PHP, VB, JavaScript, Perl, etc... <ROLMAO>

Because they evolved past Punch cards LAST Century! <shock!>

-Ken Killian-

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roche,
Bob
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:06 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client

for

System i & iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

H option(*SRCSTMT)

Now the compiler uses your line numbers. I also add *NODEBUGIO.

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
Yeung
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 8:48 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client

for

System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Roche, Bob <broche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Why do you not like sequence numbers? When there is a problem in the

code, isn't it nice to have the system tell you where it is? It's not

like

RDI make syou look at them.

I think folks that don't like sequence numbers are specifically against
*stored* sequence numbers. Personally, I consider them to be mostly
harmless, but completely useless. I have auto-renumbering on, and

compiler

listings have their own sequence number anyway.

When I say "mostly harmless", the very small harm I see is threefold:
(1) costs a small amount of storage, (2) costs a minuscule amount of

CPU

to do recalculation, (3) creates a slight amount of confusion (does a

line

number refer to the stored sequence number or the compiler-assigned
sequence number?). I cannot stress enough that these are very, very

small

costs. But for me, there is zero benefit. Display of sequence numbers
should be handled dynamically by the editor, and error messages should
report the ordinal line number accordingly. You can see in RPG IV

compiler

listings and dumps that IBM had precisely this in mind. And folks
programming in other languages on other platforms had been doing

without

stored line numbers (happily!) for decades prior to RPG IV.

John Y.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message
email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com