Re: RDi 9.5 announcement

Hey Joe, good to see you!

Have you (or anyone else here) tried saving source to the IFS? And do you still get notified of where the problems are? Are you speaking of notification in the job log when running the program, or in the editor, when writing code or compiling the object?

I've not tried that, so hoping someone else can give it a try!!

Vern

On 9/3/2015 11:33 AM, Joe Pluta wrote:

Triple thumbs up on this.

I have snippets for CTL-OPT and every one has OPTION(*SRCSTMT:*NODEBUGIO).

I LOVE when the OS tells me which source line blew up.

Now if only the MONITOR opcode kept track of the original source line...

H option(*SRCSTMT)

Now the compiler uses your line numbers. I also add *NODEBUGIO.

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 8:48 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Roche, Bob <broche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why do you not like sequence numbers? When there is a problem in the code, isn't it nice to have the system tell you where it is? It's not like RDI make syou look at them.

I think folks that don't like sequence numbers are specifically against *stored* sequence numbers. Personally, I consider them to be mostly harmless, but completely useless. I have auto-renumbering on, and compiler listings have their own sequence number anyway.