Re: RDi 9.5 announcement -- WDSCI-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Triple thumbs up on this.

I have snippets for CTL-OPT and every one has OPTION(*SRCSTMT:*NODEBUGIO).

I LOVE when the OS tells me which source line blew up.

Now if only the MONITOR opcode kept track of the original source line...

H option(*SRCSTMT)

Now the compiler uses your line numbers. I also add *NODEBUGIO.

-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 8:48 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RDi 9.5 announcement

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Roche, Bob <broche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Why do you not like sequence numbers? When there is a problem in the code, isn't it nice to have the system tell you where it is? It's not like RDI make syou look at them.

I think folks that don't like sequence numbers are specifically against *stored* sequence numbers. Personally, I consider them to be mostly harmless, but completely useless. I have auto-renumbering on, and compiler listings have their own sequence number anyway.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.