Re: Compare showing sequence number differences

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dave - I'm posting twice - the built-in is the Eclipse compare, I 
believe - not useful.

The CODE compare is still with us in some form, just hard to get to from 
RSE - open a source member, then go to Edit menu and look for the 
Compare file... item there - badabing!!

HTH
Vern

On 3/13/2012 2:13 PM, Dave Shaw wrote:
> I agree - for comparisons the CODE compare is the best, with the Softlanding
> extension being a reasonable second place, and the built-in coming in a dismal
> third.  If all I had available was the built-in, I'd put the source in text
> files and use the comparison in Notepad++ rather than use it.  I just don't like
> it, and I don't understand why IBM couldn't make a better one.
>
> Dave Shaw
> Mohawk Industries
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Jeff Crosby<jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for
> System i&  iSeries<wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tue, March 13, 2012 10:00:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Compare showing sequence number differences
>
> IBM had a very functional compare way back in the CODE400 editor.  I
> still use it and not the LPEX editor compare.
>
> I wasn't aware Softlanding had one . . .
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:28 AM,<darren@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > The RSE extensions do work better.  Thank you for the tip.  As a short
> > commentary, I am disappointed that IBM couldn't accomplish something as
> > basic as a functional compare.