×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I agree - for comparisons the CODE compare is the best, with the Softlanding
extension being a reasonable second place, and the built-in coming in a dismal
third. If all I had available was the built-in, I'd put the source in text
files and use the comparison in Notepad++ rather than use it. I just don't like
it, and I don't understand why IBM couldn't make a better one.
Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries
----- Original Message ----
From: Jeff Crosby <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for
System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, March 13, 2012 10:00:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Compare showing sequence number differences
IBM had a very functional compare way back in the CODE400 editor. I
still use it and not the LPEX editor compare.
I wasn't aware Softlanding had one . . .
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:28 AM, <darren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The RSE extensions do work better. Thank you for the tip. As a short
commentary, I am disappointed that IBM couldn't accomplish something as
basic as a functional compare.
midrange.com
