I tend to agree with Kurt. Now, when I was reading email with my treo
palm (long exchanged with a black berry) I hated the untrimed messages too
as it took awhile to open each message.
Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
[1]
http://www.dekko.com
-----wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries [2]<wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kurt Anderson <kurt.anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: [3]wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 10/20/2011 01:11PM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Replies to Replies to Replies .......
I like having all the responses within the email so I can reference what
was said earlier, and quickly. What I don't like is when the person's
response is hidden within those earlier messages. Sometimes it's quite
clear and apparent, otherwise I can't distinguish between the 'in-line'
response and a quoted message. Likely due to Outlook's formatting.
Unless the response is to specifically to me and I feel I should
attempt to decipher the response, I pretty much always delete 'in-line'
responses w/o reading them.
-Kurt
</kurt.anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References
Visible links
1.
http://www.dekko.com/
2. mailto:wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
3. mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
midrange.com
