-----Message d'origine-----
[mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Buck

Yesterday we held an IT department meeting, where it was
announced that following the installation of OS V6R1, we've
now acquired a new machine and we'll be migrating at the end
of the month. I thought I'd learnt from this list that a
decision would have to made concerning the choice of
development environment, ie, RDi (or whatever it would be
called) and/or ADTS. So I asked the question what that
decision was. The reply was vague and implied that we'd
managed to "get round" that problem. I felt pretty stupid.
So, the bulk of us will stay on ADTS with a couple using WDSc V6.1.

That's criminal.

What is, the fact that I still have to use WDSc V6 or that the issue of choosing was somehow overcome? Could a deal have been made with our IBM partner so that we could continue as we always have? I was so looking forward to Rdi.

ps I submitted this scenario to Scott Adams for his Dilbert

Don't forget to let me know if it gets used!

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.